RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03681
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be
upgraded.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His punishment was extreme. His character of service was
excellent up to the time of his discharge. He served honorably
and was promoted to grade of E-4 in under two years. He had a
high-level security clearance and was stationed at bases
responsible for guarding nuclear weapons.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 5 Nov 70, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.
On 26 Sep 74, the applicant was discharged from service and
issued an UOTHC discharge certificate. He served 3 years,
6 months and 13 days on active duty. He had 133 days of lost
time due to confinement.
On 29 Aug 77, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied
a similar request by the applicant.
The documents pertaining to the applicants discharge are
contained in the AFDRB Hearing Record at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial. DPSOR states that based on the
documentation on file in his master personnel record, the
applicants discharge was consistent with the procedural and
substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was
within the discretion of the discharge authority. In addition,
the applicant did not submit any evidence of an error or
injustice that occurred during the discharge processing to
warrant a change to his characterization of service.
The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 21 Dec 12 and 16 Apr 13, for review and comment within
30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response
(Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After
careful consideration of the available evidence, we found no
indication that the actions taken to affect his discharge and
characterization of his service were improper, contrary to the
provisions of the governing regulations in effect at the time, or
based on factors other than his own misconduct. In the interest
of justice, we considered upgrading his discharge based on
clemency; however, the applicant has provided no information
pertaining to his post-service activities and accomplishments to
warrant such consideration. Should he provide documentary
evidence pertaining to his activities since leaving the service,
we would be willing to reconsider his request. In the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to
favorably consider this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-03681 in Executive Session on 30 May 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-03681:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Aug 12.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 28 Nov 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Dec 12.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 16 Apr 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03681
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03681 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded. On 29 Aug 77, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied a similar request by the applicant. _________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04545
On 3 Aug 09, the applicant submitted an appeal to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB). DPSOR states that based on the documentation on file in the applicants master personnel records, the discharge to include the narrative reason for separation and separation code was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. ________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03743
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03743 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 28 Sep 2009, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the applicants request for a discharge upgrade. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03743
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03743 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 28 Sep 2009, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the applicants request for a discharge upgrade. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03925
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The RE Code of 2C is required based on the ELS...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01987
On 29 Nov 11, the applicant applied to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have her discharge upgraded to honorable. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicants commander notified her she was being separated...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05322
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05322 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that on 31 Jul 07, he was released from active duty and retired in accordance with the provisions of 10 USC Section 1251, rather than being transferred to the Air Force Reserve. Therefore, the applicant submitted a...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00375
On 9 Aug 02, the applicant's commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for commission of a serious crime, specifically one or more indecent acts or offenses with a child under the age of 16. They concluded that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process. DPSOR found no...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01385
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends approval, indicating there is evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant’s DD Form 214 accurately reflects his Foreign Service Credit for his assignment to Clark Air Base but does not show...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03735
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She submitted a DD Form 293, Application for Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces, for upgrade of her general discharge but it was denied by the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) on 19 Jun 14. On 10 Sep 10 she was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions) with a narrative reason for separation of Misconduct (minor infractions), and Reentry (RE) code 2B which denotes Discharged under General or other than honorable...